Posts Tagged ‘LGBT’

1 Down, 7 to Go!

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Oh Happy Day!

To the con­ser­v­a­tive priests and min­is­ters in Queens who ral­lied behind a vio­lent domes­tic abuser and sup­ported him from their pul­pits say­ing vot­ers faced a “tough deci­sion” — Um, not really.

Per­alta — son of work­ing class immi­grants who defends ten­ants and fights for health care in his work­ing class neigh­bor­hood and yes, hap­pened to vote 3 times for mar­riage equal­ity, Versus:

Montser­rate — stole a quar­ter of a mil­lion dol­lars in tax­payer funds through a sham char­ity he set up, cut his girlfriend’s face “acci­den­tally” with a bro­ken glass, dragged her bleed­ing pro­fusely through his build­ing lobby where he was caught on tape (oops), then drove her 14 miles past 8 other hos­pi­tals to take her out of the city to Long Island for emer­gency care, then was con­victed of crimes in said inci­dent and expelled from the State Sen­ate by his peers…

Tough deci­sion?  Vot­ers did not think so.

LGBT New York­ers Defeat Mon­ser­rate, Elect Peralta

In what should become a model for how LGBT activists deal with elected offi­cials who vote against equal rights, Fight Back New York’s cam­paign to defeat for­mer State Sen­a­tor Hiram Mon­ser­rate paid off big. Mon­ser­rate was defeated eas­ily by Jose Per­alta by a 3 –1 mar­gin. Per­ralta is a mem­ber of the State Assem­bly who voted for mar­riage for same-sex cou­ples three times.

Mon­ser­rate, who was con­victed of a mis­de­meanor for an assault in which his girlfriend’s face was slashed with a bro­ken bot­tle, was one of 38 state sen­a­tors who voted against the New York mar­riage bill last year. Monserrate’s defeat is a clear mes­sage to politi­cians: vote against LGBT equal­ity and use our fam­i­lies as polit­i­cal foot­balls and we will take you out.

From The New York Times:

Mr. Per­alta, mean­while, had a vir­tual army of out­side sup­port­ers at his dis­posal, includ­ing union mem­bers, women’s rights groups and gay activists, among them mem­bers of Fight Back New York, a well-financed polit­i­cal action com­mit­tee that works to oust state sen­a­tors who oppose same-sex mar­riage and put Mr. Mon­ser­rate first on its list.

Fight Back New York is a smart and aggres­sive new PAC focused on one thing: defeat­ing anti-equality New York state sen­a­tors. In a mat­ter of weeks, Fight Back New York built a polit­i­cal machine that sent out nearly 100,000 pieces of hard-hitting direct mail to edu­cate vot­ers, made 10,000 tar­geted phone calls to prime vot­ers, launched an aggres­sive online infor­ma­tion cam­paign, and pro­duced a pow­er­ful video mes­sage from Cyn­thia Nixon.

As Nixon says in the video, “We’ve tried the car­rot. Now its time for the stick.”

Fight Back New York’s work doesn’t end with the defeat of Hiram Mon­ser­rate. Its really the beginning.

From a recent Fight Back New York email:

In the next sev­eral weeks, we will together build a stronger, more robust cam­paign that will set its sights on where we can have the most impact for addi­tional vic­to­ries in the Sep­tem­ber pri­mary elec­tions and the Novem­ber gen­eral elec­tions. Each and every one of the remain­ing 37 New York State Sen­a­tors who voted “no” to mar­riage equality-Democrats and Republicans-will be fair game.

Join with Fight Back New York to build a pro-equality state senate.

Messaging to African-American Communities About LGBT Equality

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Whew.  This report has been a long-time in com­ing, and I’d be lying if I didn’t say that pro­duc­ing it has cost me at least one of my nine catty lives…at the same time, it’s the rare project for me wherein I really learned a lot of things that I did not know before, and I feel we broke new ground because there is so lit­tle in-depth research in the area.  For those of you too lazy to read it all, the main points:

To Read the full Report, Click Here:        MessagingToAfricanAmericanCommunities_FNL

  • major­ity of African-Americans do not see LGBT equal­ity as a log­i­cal exten­sion of the civil rights move­ment.  This is not because they are more or less anti-gay than other Amer­i­cans; rather, they ascribe a very unique and per­sonal descrip­tion to the words “civil rights,” whereas other Amer­i­cans tend to use “civil, equal, and human” rights inter-changeably.
  • When asked to define civil rights, many African Amer­i­cans go directly to exam­ples of issues that were prob­lems dur­ing the civil rights era of the 1950s-1970s, or even the spe­cific wrongs reme­died by the Civil Rights Act.  Thus, when asked whether or not the phrase applies to the strug­gles of gays and les­bians, often respon­dents go to unfa­vor­able com­par­isons between the two groups, e.g. “the last time I checked, they (gays and les­bians) could eat in a restau­rant,” or “they have the right to vote.”
  • In con­trast, using the terms “equal rights” or “human rights” to describe LGBT equal­ity causes pos­i­tive asso­ci­a­tions and respon­dents typ­i­cally said “we are all human,” or “we are all cre­ated equal.”
  • Dis­crim­i­na­tion is the great equal­izer (unfor­tu­nately), in that African-Americans over­whelm­ingly rec­og­nize that gays and les­bians also face dis­crim­i­na­tion and feel that the prob­lems of African Amer­i­cans and LGBT Amer­i­cans in this area are far worse than those faced by other groups.  Haye crimes, bul­ly­ing, job and hous­ing dis­crim­i­na­tion, and ben­e­fits for unmar­ried part­ners are all seen as prob­lems for both groups.  Mar­riage is not con­sid­ered as a dis­crim­i­na­tion issue.